Fixed missing reference

This commit is contained in:
Warwick New 2026-04-23 13:08:25 +01:00
parent cf9883f7f0
commit d71a842cd2
2 changed files with 36 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
@Article{EdwardL.Deci2011, @Article{EdwardL.Deci2011,
author = {Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan}, author = {Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan},
title = {Self-Determination Theory}, title = {Self-Determination Theory},
@ -916,6 +915,41 @@ In 2016, the author earned the title of Doctor of Humanity, hold a Ph.D. in Info
language = {English}, language = {English},
} }
@Article{Braun2006,
author = {Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke},
journal = {Qualitative Research in Psychology},
title = {Using thematic analysis in psychology},
year = {2006},
number = {2},
pages = {77--101},
volume = {3},
abstract = {Thematic analysis is a poorly demarcated, rarely acknowledged, yet widely used qualitative analytic method within psychology. In this paper, we argue that it offers an accessible and theoretically flexible approach to analysing qualitative data. We outline what thematic analysis is, locating it in relation to other qualitative analytic methods that search for themes or patterns, and in relation to different epistemological and ontological positions. We then provide clear guidelines to those wanting to start thematic analysis, or conduct it in a more deliberate and rigorous way, and consider potential pitfalls in conducting thematic analysis. Finally, we outline the disadvantages and advantages of thematic analysis. We conclude by advocating thematic analysis as a useful and flexible method for qualitative research in and beyond psychology.},
doi = {10.1191/1478088706qp063oa},
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa},
groups = {Method},
publisher = {Routledge},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa},
}
@Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:bibtex;} @Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:bibtex;}
@Comment{jabref-meta: grouping: @Comment{jabref-meta: grouping:

View file

@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ first-stage programming students' debugging ability?}
environment can throw at them with the use of a conversational AI agent based environment can throw at them with the use of a conversational AI agent based
avatar, which will break down the process of solving debugging issues in their avatar, which will break down the process of solving debugging issues in their
own real world programming environment. own real world programming environment.
\newline
The key feature of the agent being that it has been created with pedagogic The key feature of the agent being that it has been created with pedagogic
strategy in mind, namely scaffolding and personality to see if AI can help strategy in mind, namely scaffolding and personality to see if AI can help